Despite currently managing historic levels of funding, DOE’s spending in American energy innovation has plummeted as a share of available funding. This data set provides transparent data and unbiased analysis of how DOE investments translate into impact.
What We’re Finding
The White House Requested a slight increase in overall staff across DOE’s science and energy innovation offices in FY27
FTE levels at DOE’s science and energy innovation offices, FY25 – FY27
FY25 numbers are confirmed; FY26 numbers are estimates; FY27 numbers are requested staff
Note: The EFI Foundation’s analysis focuses exclusively on DOE’s science and energy innovation offices, unless noted otherwise. See our methodology for a full list of offices tracked. “FTE” is used throughout to mean full-time equivalents for federal employees, as measured by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Data are from OMB’s Presidential Budget Request Technical Supplement for fiscal year 2027.
The White House Requested increases for staff at most priority offices
FTE levels at select DOE offices, FY25 – FY27
FY25 numbers are confirmed; FY26 numbers are estimates; FY27 numbers are requested staff
Note: “FTE” is used throughout to mean full-time equivalents for federal employees, as measured by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Data are from OMB’s Presidential Budget Request Technical Supplement for fiscal year 2027. “EDF” is used for LPO accounts; “HGEO” is used for both FE and HGEO accounts.
The White House Proposed Steep Staffing Cuts Even for Offices Supporting Its Technology Priorities
In many cases, these offices’ staffing levels are projected to be smaller than they were in the first Trump administration, despite the fact that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) budgetary resources and responsibilities have grown.
Proposed FY26 staff reductions compared to FY24 levels
Note: “FTE” is used throughout to mean full-time equivalents for federal employees, as measured by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Data are from OMB’s Presidential Budget Request Technical Supplement for fiscal year 2026.
Staff Reductions Save Little While Increasing Workloads
Note: “Object classes” are categories defined by OMB that indicate the purpose of government spending, such as salaries, grants, etc. “Federal employees” encompasses object classes 11 and 12: “Compensation” and “Benefits”.
Staff Reductions in 2025 Mark the Largest in Recent History
DOE’s unprecedented workforce cuts may have played a role in the department’s limited spending last year.
Net staff changes, DOE-wide
Note: 2015-2024 data from FedScope; 2025 data from DOE’s September 2025 Lapse Plan.
Federal Data to Drive Innovation
The Energy Innovation Project aggregates federal data into a centralized database designed to equip policymakers with credible, decision-useful information.
Partnership Drives Progress
If you have ideas, information, or inspiration, we want to hear from you.
About This Data Set
Transparent data and unbiased analysis of DOE staffing, budgeting, and contracting needs are crucial. EFIF is assembling relevant data from hundreds of federal government reports to provide new insights into how people impact progress in innovation.
This data and analysis focuses on DOE’s energy and science innovation programs, examining DOE workforce trends, staffing levels, skill sets, and how contractors are used to execute the mission.

Recent Related Analysis
-
Is DOE Open for Business?
What We’re Tracking The Energy Innovation Project is summarizing recent science and energy innovation activities at the U.S. Department of Energy and what might be…
-
DOE’s 2025 in Review
DOE’s 2025 in Review: A Year of Radical Uncertainty (February 2026) reviews U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) actions over Year One of the second Trump…
-
DOE Staff Crunch Slows American Energy Innovation
DOE Staff Crunch Slows American Energy Innovation (September 2025) explores the relationship between the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) staffing levels and funding to catalyze and implement…



