staffing reductions

cost of reductions

DOE STAFF CHANGE OVER TIME

In many cases, these offices’ staffing levels are projected to be smaller than they were in the first Trump administration, despite the fact that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) budgetary resources and responsibilities have grown.

Proposed FY26 staff reductions compared to FY24 levels

Download the data

Note: “FTE” is used throughout to mean full-time equivalents for federal employees, as measured by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

Data are from OMB’s Presidential Budget Request Technical Supplement for fiscal year 2026.

Staff salaries and benefits comprise just 2% of DOE’s overall spending on science and energy innovation.

Download the data

Note: “Object classes” are categories defined by OMB that indicate the purpose of government spending, such as salaries, grants, etc.

“Federal employees” encompasses object classes 11 and 12: “Compensation” and “Benefits”.

DOE’s unprecedented workforce cuts may have played a role in the department’s limited spending last year.

Historical changes in DOE staffing levels

Download the data

Note: 2015-2024 data from FedScope; 2025 data from DOE’s September 2025 Lapse Plan.

The Energy Innovation Project aggregates federal data into a centralized database designed to equip policymakers with credible, decision-useful information.

If you have ideas, information, or inspiration, we want to hear from you.

Transparent data and unbiased analysis of DOE staffing, budgeting, and contracting needs are crucial. EFIF is assembling relevant data from hundreds of federal government reports to provide new insights into how people impact progress in innovation.

This data and analysis focuses on DOE’s energy and science innovation programs, examining DOE workforce trends, staffing levels, skill sets, and how contractors are used to execute the mission.